Skip to content

Tag: philology

I Literally Dislike this Word

Literally, adverb. The primary or intended meaning of a verb.

This word plagues common speech. In part it helps us solve the dilemma of how to describe uncommon events in a public speech overwrought with the embossing and adornment of hyperbole, however it is fraught with risk.

Let us consider the case for usage.

An Uncommon Case for Usage

To use ‘literally’ is to signify an uncommon occurrence. Moreover it is used to imply the honest retelling of events.

So ‘literally’ maybe used to call attention to the verb it adjoins and signal it’s actual meaning, the seriousness in which the author ascribes that meaning, and the lack of exaggeration in the now expected extraordinary claim to follow.

  1. Superman literally lifts a car on the cover of the first Superman comic.
  2. I literally wrote out The Complete Works of Shakespeare, and now I can quote it at will.
  3. She literally sculled two litres of milk, and then, just as swift, threw them back up again in a torrent of white.

We can see that in no way does using ‘literally’ increase the veracity of a claim. The reader is left no better off than had the word not been used at all.

Consider instead:

  1. Superman lifts a car on the cover of the first Superman comic.
  2. I wrote out The Complete Works of Shakespeare, and now I can quote it at will.
  3. She sculled two litres of milk, and then, just as swift, threw them back up again in a torrent of white.

Veracity or otherwise is established in context.

Using ‘literally’ makes the reader ask, why now? Why is it so important that I believe you now? And, in turn, has the unintended consequence of making it more likely that you’re claim will be doubted.

Not recommended for use.

The Non-Existent Case for Emphasis

There is no case for emphasis, however, its usage is on the rise.

In each case below we see an unintended comic effect as ‘literally’ creates a visual image at odds with meaning of the sentence.

  1. I literally caught her eye, and now we’re going out this Friday.
  2. She literally had an alien child that wont do what it’s told.
  3. I literally shot the Prime Minister on my sweet new handy-cam.

In all these examples we note the comic effect sits in contrast to the intended seriousness.

Not recommended for use.

A Comedic Case (with a hidden compartment)

All of the above turns on its head when the intended aim is comedy.

  1. I literally caught her eye, so I gave it back to her.
  2. She literally gave birth to an alien, kill it, no trap it.
  3. I literally shot the Prime Minister, it is a magic trick we’ve been working on.

None of this of course is actually that funny, and so the case literally falls apart – no matter how many times we put it back together again.

Not recommended for use.

An Unreliable Joy

In fiction we might attempt to use ‘literally’ to create a serious/comic incongruity, a metaphorical oxymoron. Such a well constructed sentence, within context, can surprise us, drawing us into the whimsy.

Such writing is joyfully unclear:

  1. And with a simple miss-step Jonathan Safran Foer literally fell from off the Ends of the World, and there he remains – plummeting through space – waiting for us to find him.
  2. Henry did not gather the strings of his mind to a single purpose, he literally laid them bare on the tabletop and counted them up so the sum was no greater than its parts.

Not recommended for the every day user or philologist alike.

Correct Usage

This one is to satisfy the philogists only.

When asking the actual meaning of a word. When asking someone to use the actual meaning of a word

  1. What does abdicate mean literally? Use instead, what is the literal meaning of abdicate? or simply, what does abdicate mean?
  2. Can you translate this literally? Use in this case if you mean a precise word for word translation.

What it tells us

In life it is better to strive for appropriateness, originality and precision least you run the risk of being thought an unreliable narrator to your own existence, which is to say, a fraud or a fool.

Use verbs appropriately because you owe it to yourself and those who are reading: Did you catch the bus or did you ride it? Did you die a little or did you suffer? Did you loose your mind or were you merely furious.

  1. Be original in your use of hyperbole and metaphor so your speech sparkles and the listener is rewarded for their time: I slept as a giant pink marshmallow in a bed of clouds; We went to work as a robot army ready to please our masters.
  2. Be precise with quantities so trust is earned and people listen: There are one thousand million stars in the galaxy and each one will eventually die.
  3. Over and under exaggerate for comic effect to bring joy to a dull moment: I ate an elephant before I got here so I might need a little sit down.

Establishing credibility takes times. It is an investment in accurately describing the world, in appropriate exaggeration, in the aptness of metaphor.

This way when describing uncommon events in a serious way there is no need to literally call attention to the fact. Your credibility is already assured.

References

Merriam-Webster. (2016). literally - definition from Merriam-Webster. Merriam-Webster. Merriam-Webster. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/literally
Oxford Dictionary. (2016). literally - definition of literally in English | Oxford Dictionaries. Oxford Dictionaries | English. Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/literally

Which one swooped? Fowl, foul or fell?

Fowl

A FOWL is a bird, like a pheasant, a chicken or a duck.

One tends to picture a Nineteenth Century English countryside with English gentlemen blasting the skies with their shotguns, hounds yapping at their heels eager to collect dead birds; That or fond memories of childhood. See Danny the Champion of the World.

They are not a swooping bird so much as a bird that gets swatted at.

Foul

An adjective meaning abhorrent or disgusting.

So we have;

  1. A foul deed;
  2. A foul stench; or,
  3. A foul play;

From where we get the noun, foul, meaning, in turn:

  1. To make shocking to the mind. As in, we all thought the bloody murder was foul;
  2. To be smelly, or on the nose. As in, your armpits are foul, go wash them; or,
  3. An illegal or unfair play. As in, the batter stuck the ball but it went off field and was a foul.

And Fell?

  1. Fell is the past tense of fall, sure, as is, I fell on my arse and broke my tail bone;
  2. It is also the verb, to fell, that is causing something to fall, as in, the lumberjack fell the tree causing it to fall;
  3. But perhaps most interestingly, it is an adjective meaning dangerous, wicked, cruel, or deadly, as in, the murderer spiced my drink with fell poison, upon which I did fall to the ground.This last meaning is little used and can most clearly be thought of as the nominative of felon, ie. when naming something particularly felonious. So for example we might say, of the felons that escaped prison, only one, a notoriously fell man, remained at large. 

It is in this final sense that we get the phrase, one fell swoop, meaning quickly, suddenly and dangerously so.

Like a lot of these historical phrases of uncertain origin, Shakespeare is a likely candidate.

In a particularly memorable and heartfelt moment, Macduff upon hearing that Macbeth has had his children and his wife killed, cries:

“All my pretty ones?
Did you say all? — O, hell-kite! All?
What, all my pretty chickens and their dam
At one fell swoop?”

Macbeth (4.3.2099-2102)

It is some startling imagery. That Macbeth like a hell hawk has swooped down and snatched Macduff’s children (the chickens) and their dam (their demoiselle, or damsel, their mother).

Usage

Perhaps this imagery is how the confusion occurs.

A fowl swoop seems only natural, that a fowl might swoop, and indeed Macbeth’s fell swoop is in imagery at least a fowl one, it is also entirely conceivably a foul one.

Further I supposed we could imagine a foul fowl swoop, say a magpie attacking you from behind .

Yes, there is nothing wrong with saying a foul swoop: a particularly horrid swoop; or fowl swoop, being the swoop made by a pheasant, however I would absolutely avoid them even when you mean exactly that, and use only fell swoop to mean something that happens dangerously and wickedly, for that is it’s meaning.

Perhaps even quote a bit of Macbeth.

References

Eastwood, K. (2016, February 16). Magpies: Avian air raiders. Retrieved November 25, 2016, from http://www.australiangeographic.com.au/topics/wildlife/2010/02/magpies-avian-air-raiders
The Free Dictionary. (2016). fell - definition of fell in English. The Free Dictionary.
Dahl, R., & Blake, Q. (2002). Danny the champion of the world (Rev. ed). New York: A.A. Knopf.

Moot or Mute point? A Mote’s Point.

A mute is someone who doesn’t speak, they are mute on the matter, indeed they are mute on every matter.

I mute the television when the ads come on. Likewise, a mute might also mute the television if the phone rang and they wanted to hear what the other person was saying, though in no way could they respond – making their answering the phone somewhat moot.

Moot

Adj. Without consequence. Of little significance.

We have:

  1. a moot idea, an idea that has no inherent usefulness;
  2. a moot desire, that does not necessitate fulfilment;
    Or more classically:
  3. a moot point, that has little bearing on matters.

A mute point, is always incorrect.

It is either the point made by a mute, in which case you’d write “a mute’s point”. This I suppose is in the world of possibility though unlikely in a rhetorical sense.

Or:

It is a point that is silenced, in which case you’d write “the point was silenced”. This expression however screams of the misunderstanding of moot. For, rhetorically speaking, points are not silenced so much as they are made moot.

Moot 2.0

Or course all of this is only half right. Or, at least, made right through common usage in the USA, Australia, and elsewhere.

The verb, to moot, past participle, mooted, its adjective moot, and noun, mootedness, all mean something quite different from the above.

The OED defines it as “subject to debate”.

We can best see this meaning when we say, the point was mooted, meaning the point was raised for discussion or argument. A moot point in this context is in fact a point that is debatable, open for question, and indeed has consequence and significance.

Why the two quiet opposite meanings?

The Free Dictionary describes how a moot was used in legal training to mean a mock judicial proceeding set up to examine a hypothetical case, and that over time the meaning of moot shifted from being the making of an argument to the making of a hypothetical argument, or an argument without consequence.

Indeed this not the first time the meaning has shifted. Previously a moot (from the Middle English Mot or mote) meant simply a gathering, or a meeting to discuss and argue. Moot, meaning to raise for debate, stems from this previous meaning, just as moot meaning without consequence stems from the meaning of a legal training moot, being mock and hypothetical.

We see then that context is crucial, so one might say:

The point was invariably moot when God stepped out of the clouds and told us the truth;

or equally,

I mooted the point as I wanted to hear all sides of the case;

or if one was writing historical horror fiction (set in England),

The moot had gathered these last five years, and though time had blunted their fear, they were still no closer to forgetting the horrors of that day.

A Mote

A mote is a small flec of dust. It can not be mooted in any sense of the word. Though it can get in the eye of a mute. In which case it is quite annoying.

References

The Free Dictionary. (2016). moot - definition of moot in freedictionary.com. The Free Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.thefreedictionary.com/moot
Oxford Dictionary. (2016). moot - definition of moot in English | Oxford Dictionaries. Oxford Dictionary. Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/moot